Some unfinished work, years ago, I never posted. I do hope I get to find the rest of them and maybe finish them. These are all the test renders I could find. These aircraft are from an old online game called Ace Online. Played it not too long ago and it sucks ass.
I am now an animation student :/ Who knew.
J C
@S-Ops
Age 34, Male
Student
Dave School
Florida
Joined on 6/2/05
- Level:
- 60
- Exp Points:
- 61,024 / 100,000
- Exp Rank:
- 82
- Vote Power:
- 10.04 votes
- Rank:
- Scout
- Global Rank:
- 32,791
- Blams:
- 42
- Saves:
- 248
- B/P Bonus:
- 4%
- Whistle:
- Normal
- Trophies:
- 1
- Medals:
- 6,301
Comments
Hmm the sleepy emoji on my 'dangers of 5G, people finna wake up a bit when they see this' review earlier? Maybe I misunderstood that? Was all ready to get into a heated debate on the pros and cons thereof here. :) Not sure where to start out of the blue now, but if you're interested in reading up on it maybe this is a good starting point: https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/
Basically I'm very much against us rolling out the technology before it's at least been tested more, since not only is the frequency so much higher than earlier generations, which aren't without dangers either, but the method of using pulsating arrays instead of regular ones may do all the more damage to our cells, and last but not least: the intended worldwide coverage via satellite, intended to cover areas where no human even lives, will be putting an unprecedented amount of powerful transmitters within the most electrified layer of out atmosphere, something we also have no idea about the effects of. It's known the ionosphere has an impact on both life and weather though. The electromagnetic balance of the whole planet might just be disrupted in a bad way...
Would be happy if we just stick to 4G and extended coverage, as it also seems like we don't really need higher speeds as much as it's claimed. Smart systems get by fine on 4G too, there's plenty implemented already, like public wastebaskets that transmit a signal when they're full. Don't need much bandwidth for that. Maybe self-driving cars would be the big thing, but as I'm no fan of self-driving cars either I'd rather we don't go down that road too fast either...
There's also the issue with new grids using up too much electricity too, since they require so much higher density with shorter frequency range/more power for higher bandwidth. In China for example they've started shutting down 5G networks off peak time to save in. So... that's my stance. Curious to hear your views on all of this too if you have any. Or get any while reading all this shizzle. ;)
Cool to know! And ah they weren't finished either... seems the final ones might blend in perfectly then...
Looks pretty good!
Cyberdevil
These are all 3D, apart from the backgrounds? Little added lensflare and sunrays in the second I guess? Looks dope. Second one in particular blends in so well it just might be real, useful with the diffusing darkness...
5G though, saw your response, I guess you're stil sleeping on the potential dangers and downsides a bit? If you're up for discussion I'd love to delve into that. Might be falsely linked to the 'rona but it's definitely no good for humankind as far as I'm concerned. Pushing satellites into the ionosphere without prior study too, that could really be catastrophic. Not just make it harder to get a real weather forecast...
S-Ops
My response on 5G? I'm sorry but I don't recall making a comment on anything 5G related, especially on newgrounds. I am always up for learning though. I'm glad you liked my art even though its unfinished. The backgrounds are indeed 3D. The 2nd image had post after effects added to it.